A history of the new California, its resources and people;
Bookreader Item Preview
Share or Embed This Item
texts
A history of the new California, its resources and people;
- Publication date
- 1905
- Publisher
- New York, Chicago, The Lewis publishing company
- Collection
- allen_county; americana
- Contributor
- Allen County Public Library Genealogy Center
- Language
- English
- Volume
- 1
- Item Size
- 726.7M
16
- Addeddate
- 2008-08-13 14:54:53
- Call number
- 31833011484398
- Camera
- Canon 5D
- Copyright-evidence
- Evidence reported by CallieLamkin for item historyofnewcali01irvi on August 13, 2008: no visible notice of copyright; stated date is 1905.
- Copyright-evidence-date
- 20080813145449
- Copyright-evidence-operator
- CallieLamkin
- Copyright-region
- US
- External-identifier
- urn:oclc:record:1046534174
- Foldoutcount
- 0
- Identifier
- historyofnewcali01irvi
- Identifier-ark
- ark:/13960/t01z4cf52
- Lccn
- 07025107
- Ocr_converted
- abbyy-to-hocr 1.1.11
- Ocr_module_version
- 0.0.14
- Openlibrary_edition
- OL13522053M
- Openlibrary_work
- OL4982611W
- Page_number_confidence
- 89
- Page_number_module_version
- 1.0.5
- Pages
- 692
- Pdf_module_version
- 0.0.23
- Possible copyright status
- NOT_IN_COPYRIGHT
- Ppi
- 500
- Scandate
- 20080814144653
- Scanfactors
- 2
- Scanner
- scribe7.indiana.archive.org
- Scanningcenter
- indiana
- Full catalog record
- MARCXML
comment
Reviews
Reviewer:
Jesse Carpenter
-
favoritefavoritefavoritefavoritefavorite -
May 6, 2021
Subject: Publication Year
Subject: Publication Year
The text volumes I and II by Leigh H. Irvine, "A History of The New California, Its Resources and People" has TWO publication years, 1903 and 1905, that is known to existed at archive.org.
Archive.org at one time had both volumes for both of the two publication years 1903 and 1905. For some reason the deleted a few volumes?
The problem with these two publication years is that the 3 and the 5, the last digit of the year, look almost alike. So whoever entered the metadata for these two sets of volumes entered the wrong year. For this reason maybe why the other volumes were deleted.
Archive.org at one time had both volumes for both of the two publication years 1903 and 1905. For some reason the deleted a few volumes?
The problem with these two publication years is that the 3 and the 5, the last digit of the year, look almost alike. So whoever entered the metadata for these two sets of volumes entered the wrong year. For this reason maybe why the other volumes were deleted.
4,286 Views
3 Favorites
DOWNLOAD OPTIONS
Temporarily Unavailable
For users with print-disabilities
Temporarily Unavailable
IN COLLECTIONS
Allen County Public Library American LibrariesUploaded by CallieLamkin on